![]() ![]() ![]() What's more, France has a two-component deterrent, which is also technologically very advanced, giving it a weight roughly equal to that of China in this area. ![]() This is how the Army has both forces suited to symmetrical high-intensity engagement and to the projection of forces in an asymmetrical environment, how the Navy has a naval aviation component that is the envy of many other countries and a vastly expanded know-how in terms of naval supremacy and power projection, and how the Air Force is able to support these two armies in all employment scenarios. Thus, today, the French authorities, like the country's public opinion, actively support the concept of a global army for the French armies, namely an armed force with the majority of the capabilities required to respond to a field of very extensive use. How, in this case, can we even imagine that France could turn to this armored vehicle, even though it is developing the MGCS and modernizing the Leclerc?Īs often, the point of view from which one approaches a problem significantly conditions the reasoning and therefore the conclusion that one can bring to it. Developed in its own funds, the Panther is offered by Rheinmetall to anyone showing an interest in acquiring a new heavy tank, including in assemblies that are to say the least improbable. Indeed, the new KF-51 Panther tank presented by its designer, the German Rheinmetall, during the Eurosatory 2022 exhibition, is today the main tool in the hands of its CEO, Armin Papperger, in an attempt to derail the Franco-German MGCS program which aims to design, precisely, the replacement of the French tank Leclerc as of the German Leopard 2. It is probably in these terms that the vast majority of readers, at least the most measured among them, have approached this new article with its slightly provocative title. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |